file.pdf (778.44 kB)

Clinical trials of health information technology interventions intended for patient use: unique issues and considerations.

Download (778.44 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 01.01.2013 by Annette DeVito Dabbs, Mi-Kyung Song, Brad Myers, Robert P. Hawkins, Jill Aubrecht, Alex Begey, Mary Connolly, Ruosha Li, Joseph M. Pilewski, Christian A. Bermudez, Mary Amanda Dew

BACKGROUND: Despite the proliferation of health information technology (IT) interventions, descriptions of the unique considerations for conducting randomized trials of health IT interventions intended for patient use are lacking.

PURPOSE: Our purpose is to describe the protocol to evaluate Pocket PATH (Personal Assistant for Tracking Health), a novel health IT intervention, as an exemplar of how to address issues that may be unique to a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate health IT intended for patient use.

METHODS: An overview of the study protocol is presented. Unique considerations for health IT intervention trials and strategies are described to maintain equipoise, to monitor data safety and intervention fidelity, and to keep pace with changing technology during such trials.

LESSONS LEARNED: The sovereignty granted to technology, the rapid pace of changes in technology, ubiquitous use in health care, and obligation to maintain the safety of research participants challenge researchers to address these issues in ways that maintain the integrity of intervention trials designed to evaluate the impact of health IT interventions intended for patient use.

CONCLUSIONS: Our experience evaluating the efficacy of Pocket PATH may provide practical guidance to investigators about how to comply with established procedures for conducting RCTs and include strategies to address the unique issues associated with the evaluation of health IT for patient use.

History

Publisher Statement

The final publication is available at Sage via http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774513493149

Date

01/01/2013

Exports