Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on Carnegie Mellon University and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.
How Effective is Micro Harm Reduction in Reducing Macro Harm?
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
posted on 01.01.1998by Jonathan Caulkins
MacCoun (1996) distinguishes between micro and macro harm reduction and notes that reducing micro harm
(harm per unit of use) may or may not reduce macro (aggregate) harm depending on its effect on use. We present
a simple model that relates micro and macro harm through five parameters: price, quantity, elasticity of demand,
elasticity of supply, and the social cost of drug use. Parameterizing the relationship for the US cocaine market in
1992 suggests that about 75% of the apparent benefit of reducing micro harm experienced by users would be offset
by increases in use. This suggests that reducing micro harm experienced by users has merit but that reducing the
costs drugs impose on non-users may merit greater attention, since reducing those costs carries no risk of being
offset by increases in use.