File(s) stored somewhere else

Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on Carnegie Mellon University and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.

Truth vs Knowledge: The Difference Between What a Component Does and What We Know It Does

journal contribution
posted on 01.01.1996 by Mary Shaw

Conventional doctrine holds that specifications are sufficient, complete, static, and homogeneous. For system-level specifications, especially for software architectures and their components, conventional doctrine often fails to hold. This can happen when properties other than functionality are critical, when not all properties of interest can be identified in advance, or when the cost of creating specifications is significant. That is, the conventional doctrine often fails for practical software components. Specifications for real software must be incremental, extensible, and heterogeneous. To support such specifications, our notations and tools must be able to extend and manipulate structured specifications. In the UniCon architecture description language, we are introducing credentials, a property-list form of specification that supports evolving heterogeneous specifications and their use with system-building and analysis tools.

History

Publisher Statement

All Rights Reserved

Date

01/01/1996

Exports

Exports