Where’s the Winner? Max-Finding and Sorting with Metric Costs
journal contributionposted on 01.06.2013 by Anupam Gupta, Amit Kumar
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
Traditionally, a fundamental assumption in evaluating the performance of algorithms for sorting and selection has been that comparing any two elements costs one unit (of time, work, etc.); the goal of an algorithm is to minimize the total cost incurred. However, a body of recent work has attempted to find ways to weaken this assumption – in particular, new algorithms have been given for these basic problems of searching, sorting and selection, when comparisons between different pairs of elements have different associated costs. In this paper, we further these investigations, and address the questions of max-finding and sorting when the comparison costs form a metric; i.e., the comparison costs cuv respect the triangle inequality cuv + cvw ≥ cuw for all input elements u,v and w. We give the first results for these problems – specifically, we present • An O(log n)-competitive algorithm for max-finding on general metrics, and we improve on this result to obtain an O(1)-competitive algorithm for the max-finding problem in constant dimensional spaces. • An O(log2 n)-competitive algorithm for sorting in general metric spaces. Our main technique for max-finding is to run two copies of a simple natural online algorithm (that costs too much when run by itself) in parallel. By judiciously exchanging information between the two copies, we can bound the cost incurred by the algorithm; we believe that this technique may have other applications to online algorithms.