In 1914, an accounting professor named Arthur Andersen founded a public accounting
practice that became the world’s largest professional-services firm. For years preceding the
Enron debacle and Andersen’s collapse, the firm had struggled to create incentives within
the organization for partners to provide high-quality service, develop and sell new services,
and meet the compensation expectations of various factions of partners. A years-long
dispute over the division of profits between the firm’s consulting and accounting arms led
to the 1998 separation of the consulting practice from the audit and tax practices. The rise,
break-up and fall of Andersen underlines the importance of questions concerning incentive
structures within public accounting firms in particular, and partnerships of professionals
in general. This paper offers a perspective on partner compensation schemes and the
accounting information systems that support them.