posted on 2007-01-01, 00:00authored byJulie S Downs, Mandy Holbrook, Lorrie F Cranor
Tools that aim to combat phishing attacks must take into account
how and why people fall for them in order to be effective. This
study reports a pilot survey of 232 computer users to reveal
predictors of falling for phishing emails, as well as trusting
legitimate emails. Previous work suggests that people may be
vulnerable to phishing schemes because their awareness of the
risks is not linked to perceived vulnerability or to useful strategies
in identifying phishing emails. In this survey, we explore what
factors are associated with falling for phishing attacks in a roleplay
exercise. Our data suggest that deeper understanding of the
web environment, such as being able to correctly interpret URLs
and understanding what a lock signifies, is associated with less
vulnerability to phishing attacks. Perceived severity of the
consequences does not predict behavior. These results suggest that
educational efforts should aim to increase users’ intuitive
understanding, rather than merely warning them about risks.