Carnegie Mellon University
file.pdf (157.41 kB)
Download file

Choosing the Right Evaluation for Machine Translation: an Examination of Annotator and Automatic Metric Performance on Human Judgment Tasks

Download (157.41 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2010-10-01, 00:00 authored by Michael Denkowski, Alon LavieAlon Lavie

This paper examines the motivation, design, and practical results of several types of human evaluation tasks for machine translation. In addition to considering annotator performance and task informativeness over multiple evaluations, we explore the practicality of tuning automatic evaluation metrics to each judgment type in a comprehensive experiment using the METEOR-NEXT metric. We present results showing clear advantages of tuning to certain types of judgments and discuss causes of inconsistency when tuning to various judgment data, as well as sources of difficulty in the human evaluation tasks themselves


Publisher Statement

Copyright 2010 AMTA



Usage metrics