Applied Linguistics has been receptive to input from a wide range of
disciplines and perspectives. Researchers have explored theoretical and
methodological inputs from linguistics, sociology, and psychology. Language
planners have accepted ideas from sociology, political science, history, and
demography. First and second language teachers have been open to all
of these fields, as well as to approaches from education, rhetoric, and
literature. This openness to new research and new ideas promotes innovation
and dynamism in Applied Linguistics. At the same time, researchers
and practitioners have often found themselves awash in a sea of conflicting
claims and recommendations from these various theoretical sources. Should
reading be taught by phonics or by the whole word method? Should we
encourage second language learners to speak in the L2 from the first day or
should we allow them to first consolidate their ability to learn from
comprehensible input? Should we provide focused vocabulary practice or
should vocabulary learning be subsumed in culturally relevant experiences?
Should we provide explicit teaching of grammatical rules or rely instead on
the student’s ability to learn implicitly?