posted on 2017-09-15, 00:00authored byA. M. SalazA. M. Salaz, Nicole Johnston, Claire Pickles
The open access (OA) movement today incorporates a number of different threads reflecting disagreement among information professionals, publishers, institutions and advocates about how OA is defined and facilitated. It is unclear in this environment how faculty members involved in teaching and research construct understanding about open access and what range of understandings among this constituency may currently exist. This paper reports the results of a study using phenomenography to understand the open access experiences and perceptions of faculty members who teach online; a growing subgroup of faculty whose professional context positions themselves and their students differently in relation to subscription-based digital and print-based library collections and support than in a brick-and-mortar educational environment. Faculty members in this group experienced open access in five qualitatively distinctive ways: as resources for teaching; as a publication channel; as a social justice movement; as open source, and as ‘free for me’. These findings have implications for outreach and communication efforts for university libraries and higher education administrators, and offer insights into the concerns and challenges faced by faculty members while engaging with open access materials.
History
Publisher Statement
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication by Elsevier in The Journal of Academic Librarianship. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.09.006
Salaz, A., Johnston, N., & Pickles, C. (2018). Faculty Members Who Teach Online: A Phenomenographic Typology of Open Access Experiences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(1), 125-132.