Carnegie Mellon University
Browse

Group heterogeneity increases the risks of large group size: a longitudinal study of productivity in research groups.

Download (396.5 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2013-06-01, 00:00 authored by Jonathon Cummings, Reza Bosagh Zadeh, Sara KieslerSara Kiesler, Aruna D. Balakrishnan

Heterogeneous groups are valuable, but differences among members can weaken group identification. Weak group identification may be especially problematic in larger groups, which, in contrast with smaller groups, require more attention to motivating members and coordinating their tasks. We hypothesized that as groups increase in size, productivity would decrease with greater heterogeneity. We studied the longitudinal productivity of 549 research groups varying in disciplinary heterogeneity, institutional heterogeneity, and size. We examined their publication and citation productivity before their projects started and 5 to 9 years later. Larger groups were more productive than smaller groups, but their marginal productivity declined as their heterogeneity increased, either because their members belonged to more disciplines or to more institutions. These results provide evidence that group heterogeneity moderates the effects of group size, and they suggest that desirable diversity in groups may be better leveraged in smaller, more cohesive units.

History

Publisher Statement

The final publication is available at Sage via http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797612463082

Date

2013-06-01

Usage metrics

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC