We study the effect of physician incentives in an HMO network. Physician
incentives are controversial because they may induce doctors to make treatment decisions
that differ from those they would chose in the absence of incentives. We set
out a theoretical framework for assessing the degree to which incentive contracts do
in fact induce physicians to deviate from a standard guided only by patient interests
and professional medical judgement. Our empirical evaluation of the model relies
on details of the HMO’s incentive contracts and access to the firm’s internal expenditure
records. We estimate that the HMO’s incentive contract provides a typical
physician an increase, at the margin, of $0.10 in income for each $1.00 reduction
in medical utilization expenditures. The average response is a 5 percent reduction
in medical expenditures. We also find suggestive evidence that financial incentives
linked to commonly used “quality” measures may stimulate an improvement in
measured quality.