What is driving the remarkable increase over the last decade in the propensity of patents to cite
academic science? Does this trend indicate that stronger knowledge spillovers from academia have
helped power the surge in innovative activity in the U.S. in the 1990s? This paper seeks to shed light
on these questions by using a common empirical framework to assess the relative importance of
various alternative hypotheses in explaining the growth in patent citations to science. Our analysis
supports the notion that the nature of U.S. inventive activity has changed over the sample period,
with an increased emphasis on the use of the knowledge generated by university-based scientists in
later years. However, the concentration of patent-to-paper citation activity within what we call the
"bio nexus" suggests that much of the contribution of knowledge spillovers from academia may be
largely confined to bioscience-related inventions.