People who believe that their society has few impediments
to upward mobility tend to oppose governmental redistribution. This is true
even among the poor. Is this because people with this belief expect to be well
off in the future, and hence oppose redistribution on self-interested grounds?
Or is it because they believe that the less well off have not made the effort to
move up, and therefore are morally undeserving of support? This paper uses
quantitative sensitivity analysis to examine the robustness of the evidence for
each of these views. It finds that the effect of prospective mobility is sensitive
to measurement error in current income. In contrast, there is robust support
for the view that beliefs about moral worthiness matter.