posted on 2009-12-01, 00:00authored byYuji Ijiri, Lin Nan
In this paper, we depict and analyze simple models of moral hazard, namely
“operating moral hazard” and “investing moral hazard.” First we assume that a corporation exists
primarily for the benefit of their shareholders. Then, moral hazard occurs when managers choose
an option knowingly that is not optimum for shareholders. We evaluate the loss to shareholders
in terms of cash flow to them in the long run. Operating moral hazard occurs when managers
adopt a non-optimum operating strategy in day-to-day operations. This moral hazard was
depicted in Ijiri and Lin (2006) using Markov processes. We will first examine the essence of
this model as a basis for comparing with investing moral hazard. The two types of moral hazard
are different in that loss to shareholders occur gradually and continuously in operating moral
hazard (possibly allowing shareholders to react), while the loss occurs discretely and often in
one-lump sum in investing moral hazard. In particular, we depict and analyze investing moral
hazard using a model in a high tech industry called “planned obsolescence,” namely not
obsolescence that naturally occurs but one that is induced by the seller of the equipment. In the
final section, we will compare the two models to see some common elements between the two
types of moral hazard, such as the larger losses to shareholders occurring in earlier periods
before the dynamic system returns to its steady state.