posted on 2010-09-23, 00:00authored byKevin T. Kelly
Simplicity has long been recognized as an apparent mark of truth in
science, but it is difficult to explain why simplicity should be accorded such
weight. This chapter examines some standard, statistical explanations of
the role of simplicity in scientific method and argues that none of them
explains, without circularity, how a reliance on simplicity could be conducive
to finding true models or theories. The discussion then turns to a
less familiar approach that does explain, in a sense, the elusive connection
between simplicity and truth. The idea is that simplicity does not point at
or reliably indicate the truth but, rather, keeps inquiry on the cognitively
most direct path to the truth.