Motivated by sponsored search auctions with hard budget constraints given by the advertisers,
we study multi-unit auctions of a single item. An important example is a sponsored
result slot for a keyword, with many units representing its inventory in a month, say. In this
single-item multi-unit auction, each bidder has a private value for each unit, and a private budget
which is the total amount of money she can spend in the auction. A recent impossibility
result [Dobzinski et al., FOCS’08] precludes the existence of a truthful mechanism with Paretooptimal
allocations in this important setting. We propose Sort-Cut, a mechanism which does
the next best thing from the auctioneer’s point of view, that we term semi-truthful. While we are
unable to give a complete characterization of equilibria for our mechanism, we prove that some
equilibrium of the proposed mechanism optimizes the revenue over all Pareto-optimal mechanisms,
and that this equilibrium is the unique one resulting from a natural rational bidding
strategy (where every losing bidder bids at least her true value). Perhaps even more significantly,
we show that the revenue of every equilibrium of our mechanism differs by at most the
budget of one bidder from the optimum revenue (under some mild assumptions).