posted on 2009-01-01, 00:00authored byDavid M. Northcutt, Mark C. Paulk
Many framework-based process improvement
programs, such as those based on
the eSourcing Capability Model for Service
Providers (eSCM-SP) and Capability Maturity
Model Integration for Development (CMMIDEV),
rely on a sample of engagements
(or projects) in drawing conclusions about
organizational capability. The intent is to
determine the normal behavior in the organization
based on a “representative” sample,
but a rigorous definition of what characterizes
a representative sample is usually not
provided. The purpose of this article is to
define in statistical terms, with explicitly
stated assumptions, what a reasonable representative
sample should be so a reliable
characterization of organizational capability
can be established. The analysis is illustrated
in the context of the eSCM-SP but can be
extended to other frameworks.