posted on 1983-12-01, 00:00authored byJoseph B. Kadane, Patrick D. Larkey
This paper explores some of the consequences of adopting a modern subjective view of
probability for game theory. The consequences are substantial. The subjective view of
probability clarifies the important distinction between normative and positive theorizing about
behavior in games, a distinction that is often lost in the search for "solution concepts" which
largely characterizes game theory since the work of von Neumann and Morgenstern. Many of
the distinctions that appear important in conventional game theory (two-person versus
n-person, zero-sum versus variable sum) appear unimportant in the subjective formulation.
Other distinctions, such as single play versus repetitive-play games, appear to be more
important in the subjective formulation than in the conventional formulation.