Across six laboratory Studies and one Field Study, we demonstrate that people remember
an unpleasant experience as more aversive when they expect this experience to return than when
they have no such expectation. Our results support a bracing explanation for this effect: When
faced with the anticipated return of the experience, people prepare for the worst by remembering
it as more aversive. This bracing can be “turned off” by either limiting people’s self-regulatory
resources or by denying them the time to brace. These results indicate that people’s general
tendency to remember aversive experiences as less unpleasant than they had actually been (as
demonstrated in prior research) does not necessarily imply that people will be willing to reengage
in these experiences—as the anticipation of repeating the experience would counter-act
the initial memory bias