The goal of this paper is to identify key issues concerning
the nature of competition in health care markets
and its impacts on quality and social welfare and
to identify pertinent findings from the theoretical and
empirical literature on this topic. The theoretical
literature in economics on competition and quality,
the theoretical literature in health economics on this
topic, and the empirical findings on competition and
quality in health care markets are surveyed and their
findings assessed.
Theory is clear that competition increases quality
and improves consumer welfare when prices are
regulated (for prices above marginal cost), although
the impacts on social welfare are ambiguous. When
firms set both price and quality, both the positive
and normative impacts of competition are ambiguous.
The body of empirical work in this area is growing
rapidly. At present it consists entirely of work on
hospital markets. The bulk of the empirical evidence
for Medicare patients shows that quality is higher in
more competitive markets. The empirical results for
privately insured patients are mixed across studies.